GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted

Community and Q&A

Wall assembly preference

AdamHorkay | Posted in General Questions on

I am planning on building a house in Indianapolis, IN (Climate Zone 5). I am trying to figure out which high R-Value wall assembly to go with. I am considering a double stud wall filled with dense-packed cellulose or a 2×6 stud wall filled with dense-packed cellulose with exterior rigid insulation.

Which one sounds good for my climate zone?

GBA Prime

Join the leading community of building science experts

Become a GBA Prime member and get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

Replies

  1. Expert Member
    Dana Dorsett | | #1

    They're all good, if done well.

    The 2x6 + exterior foam is an easier build unless going for 4" + on the foam. Dense packing double studwalls is hard to do well, but it's a lot greener (cellulose insulation is sequestered carbon, with a negative carbon footprint.)

    A 2x6/R20 wall with 3" of exterior polyiso comes in at about the same ~R30 "whole-wall" thermal performance as a double-studwall with 9.5" thick cellulose, either of which is approaching the limits of financial rationality on an lifecycle energy cost basis.

    See walls 2b & 4 , and the corresponding discussions of Case 2 on p34 & Case 4 on p37 of this document:

    https://buildingscience.com/sites/default/files/migrate/pdf/BA-0903_High-R_Value_Walls_Case_Study_rev_2014.pdf

    See Table 2, the zone 5 row of this document:

    https://buildingscience.com/sites/default/files/migrate/pdf/BA-1005_High%20R-Value_Walls_Case_Study.pdf

    It might even be rational to back off to the climate zone 4 row, given the now higher efficiency of heat pumps that 10 years ago, and the dramatic reductions in the cost of solar, and the fact that Indianapolis will be in zone 4 well within the lifecycle of a house at the current rate of climate change.

  2. Jon_R | | #2

    I'd use MemBrain, cellulose filled 2x6s, tape or liquid sealed plywood, DrainWrap, 1.5" or more unfaced EPS, pressure equalized rain-screen, substantial overhangs. But there are lots of designs that work.

    1. Expert Member
      Dana Dorsett | | #3

      1.5" of cellulose doesn't quite cut it for dew point control a the sheathing in zone 5, but the cellulose + MemBrain + the higher vapor permeance of EPS offer a lot of forgiveness on that, and it'll be already be in zone 4 before 2050. From a whole-wall-R point of view (about R20 or a hair more) it's probably nowhere near the financial rationality limit either.

      1. Jon_R | | #4

        > ... offer a lot of forgiveness on that

        So much so that it will outperform (moisture wise) most walls with more exterior R value and Class I exterior perms. Increase EPS thickness as you see fit for R value.

  3. Expert Member
    MALCOLM TAYLOR | | #5

    Adam,

    A lot depends on that the common practices are in your area. As Dana said, dense-packing cellulose needs experienced installers, and similarly, properly detailed exterior foam is something best specified where builders are familiar with it. The first thing I'd do is feel out some local contractors to see what they prefer.

  4. GBA Editor
    Brian Pontolilo | | #6

    Hi Adam,

    This article takes a pretty close look at the assemblies you are considering, with some variations as well:
    How to Design a Wall

Log in or create an account to post an answer.

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |