GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted

Community and Q&A

Unvented roof: exterior vs. interior/exterior insulation

jasonhoetger | Posted in General Questions on
I am currently mulling roof insulation options for a new construction home with an unvented low-slope ceiling (2:12) in climate zone 4C (Seattle area). I’ve read through the many GBA and other articles singing the praises of insulating above the deck, especially https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/article/insulating-low-slope-residential-roofs and https://www.buildingscience.com/documents/building-science-insights/bsi-100-hybrid-assemblies
 
Yet 100% above-the-deck insulation seems to be a relatively uncommon option in residential construction–my architect was unaware it was even possible to insulate an unvented roof with any amount of exterior rigid foam. I’m considering going 100% above (7+” of polyiso), or a combination of exterior foam and interior fiberglass batt or dense-pack cellulose (same as my wall cavities). In 4C, IRC Table R806.5 requires only R-10 of air-impermeable insulation for condensation control in the hybrid approach.
 
100% exterior foam seems simple and straightforward. I feel like I’m missing something. What are the downsides to fully insulating the roof using exterior insulation? Is it high cost? Complicated install due to very thick foam? Aesthetics? The downsides must be pretty big for it to be so uncommon… right?
 
Hybrid is appealing, but it adds a bit of complication, providing one more opportunity for something to go wrong. But it should cost less than the 100%-rigid-foam approach and make it easier to super-insulate. Since I’m insulating my walls that way anyway, the added complication would be minimal, I hope.
 
I’d appreciate any thoughts or experiences you’ve had with 100% exterior vs. hybrid insulation for an unvented roof. Thanks!

GBA Prime

Join the leading community of building science experts

Become a GBA Prime member and get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

Replies

  1. Expert Member
    Akos | | #1

    Working with foam over 3" is a pain, as the screws get longer, it gets difficult to hit the rafters bellow. Very fussy work especially if you want to keep the structure exposed. Long screws also tend to be pricey and all that foam also costs a fair bit, batts are cheap.

    I recently did a studio roof with exterior insulation only, but used 2.5". There, it was easier to insulate on the outside and keep the old wood ceiling exposed then to insulate on the inside and have to drywall.

    P.S. when going with either all foam or hybrid approach, you are better with complying on U factor basis for insulation. This works out to around R38, with any foam insulation, the ROI for going up to R49 is practically never.

    1. jasonhoetger | | #2

      Thanks, your comment about "fussiness" really put things into focus for me. I definitely want to avoid a high level of fussiness. Complicated + novel is a recipe for mistakes.

      If I do more than 3" on top, I was thinking of laying down 2x4s halfway through, as suggested in a few other Q&As, to reduce some of that fussiness. But reflecting more on your comment, that would still be a pretty complicated installation; I would probably have to carefully walk the installers through it.

      2" of polyiso (hopefully reclaimed, so I'm derating to 5.5) plus R30 batts (9.5" cavities) should meet the U-factor alternative and reduce thermal bridging. If cost/benefit analysis shows a few more R would be beneficial, I can add polyiso or switch to dense-pack cellulose or open cell foam on the interior. Gives me some additional flexibility and seems to be a cost-effective solution.

      Thanks--your comment was just what I needed!

  2. qthisup | | #3

    What are your interior ceiling finishes and what will be your roofing material? I've done a number of these types of roofs and might be able to offer some advice.

    1. jasonhoetger | | #4

      Metal roof, drywall on the interior. Thanks, any advice/insight would be great!

  3. qthisup | | #5

    Hi Jason
    In which case I would go hybrid. I've done fully exterior, cavity only and hybrid. As Akos touched on because you won't have an exposed timber interior ceiling it makes things easier.
    I am not a building scientist expert by any means but my reading on here suggests this is safe, and as somone who's built a number of these the process and practicalities seam to work.
    Layers from interior to exterior:
    1) Drywall airtight, minimize can/pot lights unless duly sealed to vapour retarder
    2) Smart vapour retarder like Membrain
    3) XX" of rockwool (depth depends on you maintaining the required ratios). A note, I have found flat roofs for only exterior rigid foam to be rather loud in our thunderous west coast rain, Rockwall is an excellent sound cushion.
    4) Ply roof sheathing
    5) Fully adhered vapour barrier (used frequently on commercial flat roofs). I think (someone please correct me) this isn't strictly needed from a building science point of view as you can tape the foam insulation seams and/or the plywood sheathing. But practically speaking, it can be applied pretty quickly and fully waterproofs your building until the overlying layers are completed. Or get your insulation down quickly and tape the seams, that will be pretty water tight. Or buy good quality flashing tape like 3M, G Tape, or the European brands and tape your plywood seams. But if it rains you need to wait for the ply to dry thoroughly before applying the insulation.
    6) 2 x thin (1-3") layers of rigid foam insulation or one thicker layer (again depending on complying with ratios and target R value. Can be attached with commercial insulation washers, or tile baker board washers with screws. I don't think you need to worry about hitting your joists here.
    7) At that low slope your metal roof is likely to require a fully adhered underlayment, see their spec. Flashing this well at the eves
    8) 2X4 spaced according to your metal roof spec and spaced to so screws hit the underlying ceiling joists. If you only have a few inches of foam insulation this is pretty easy. Yes you'll miss some. I use a mix of standard 6" treated screws (to save money) and large headed type structural screws like GRK and Fastenmaster. Make sure the head is countersunk.
    8b option) I have used 1x4 instead of 2x4 as strapping as well. I found it a bit uneven and had to play with screw tightness and shim to get flat. Then overlaid with 1/2" ply then the underlayment, this approach allows the metal roofing to sit directly on the ply and roofing screws to be applied anywhere.
    Hopefully somewhat helpful!

Log in or create an account to post an answer.

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |