GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted

Community and Q&A

Low E House wrap

user-1093260 | Posted in Energy Efficiency and Durability on

Has anyone had any experience with Low E House wrap. Due to the existing design of this new home I am looking for the least expensive way to minimize thermal bridging. I am building with ICF foundation, 2×6 exterior studs, spray foam insulation, 1/2 plywood sheathing, cement board siding. At this stage of the game I can not afford to have this home re engineered. Looking for as efficient as I can get.

GBA Prime

Join the leading community of building science experts

Become a GBA Prime member and get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

Replies

  1. GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #1

    Dana,
    There is no legal definition of "low-e," I'm afraid. What is the emissivity of the housewrap?

    The housewrap may or may not be a radiant barrier. One product that is touted as a low-e housewrap is Tyvek Thermawrap. Thermawrap is NOT a radiant barrier, since a radiant barrier must have an emissivity of 0.1 or less. The emissivity of Thermawrap is 0.2 -- too high to be considered a radiant barrier.

    Products like Thermawrap only work if they are facing an air space, so that requires vertical rainscreen strapping between the Thermawrap and your siding. If you install the product this way, you will raise the R-value of the air space from R-1 (which you would get with any old housewrap) to R-2. In other words, the Thermawrap gives you an additional R-1. That's not much.

  2. Expert Member
    ARMANDO COBO | | #2

    Or as another option, you may want to save money on the cavity spray foam, replace it with cellulose and install taped rigid foam outside the sheathing; it’ll replace the wrap as a WRB, and it will void the thermal bridging. You’ll have a more durable and better assembly, and more than likely, save you money.

  3. ELGz7XBfk8 | | #3

    I agree not to use spray foam or OSB for sheathing. The spray foam will stabilize in about one hour but your framing is drying and shrinking for 2 years after which time your "tight" home will now be very leaky. Cellulose is the way to go with exterior taped rigid foam and a poly interior air-vapor barrier. Like the post above, this will save you construction costs AND energy costs in the future AND make your home more comfortable.

  4. user-659915 | | #4

    Good advice from Stephen & Armando. SPF is not your best choice.

  5. user-956061 | | #5

    ditto

  6. wjrobinson | | #6

    No location posted. In an A/C climate, no poly, need drying to the interior.

Log in or create an account to post an answer.

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |