Drainage Plane Between Exterior Foam Insulation and Sheathing
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/29a71430cbcdd5e60a509ea6b7779752?s=52&d=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.greenbuildingadvisor.com%2Fapp%2Favatars%2F200x200%2Fs.png&r=g)
I’m getting ready to install 2″ exterior polyiso over OSB sheathing for my small addition. I had not planned to install an additional drainage plane behind the polyiso, but this Matt Risinger video is causing me to reconsider:
Interior Details Interior Details 15:53
My wall, zone 6A (inside to out):
*drywall, air-sealed
*2×6 (considering under-filling with rockwool R15 batts to make temp gradient through wall more favorable, undecided at this point)
*osb (zip, taped)
*2″ Polyiso, taped, drainage plane
*3/4″ furring rainscreen
*cladding
While my assembly can only dry to the interior, I believe that it is low risk for condensation with this interior/exterior insulation ratio. I also feel the zip has enough texture to allow for drainage at the zip/polyiso interface.
Should I consider an additional drainage plane between the polyiso and zip? I’m not an expert, but in many ways what is shown in the video is counter intuitive to me. It seems that an air gap between the polyiso and sheathing would invite cold air and potentially make those surfaces more susceptible to condensation.
GBA Detail Library
A collection of one thousand construction details organized by climate and house part
![](https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/app/themes/greenbuildingadvisor/dist/img/modules/detail-library/thumb1.png)
![](https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/app/themes/greenbuildingadvisor/dist/img/modules/detail-library/thumb2.png)
Replies
I don't really think it's necessary to have a drainage plane between the polyiso and the sheathing. There is absolutely no reason for a drainage plane on the front of the polyiso, since the rainscreen gap already serves that purpose.
If you do want to put something behind the polyiso, I'd use something very minimal like Tyvek Drainwrap.
Bill
2" polyiso is close enough to the required amount of exterior insulation for condensation control for a 2x6 wall, I would insulate with full size batts.
I've built pretty much this wall in zone 5 and have never included any drainage behind the iso. Taping the iso doesn't hurt but it is also not really needed if you already have the sheathing taped.
Thanks Bill and Akos.
It sounds like there is some consensus to nix the drainage plan behind the polyiso, which was my thinking as well.
With that said, I still wonder if I'm missing something, since the Risinger video makes reference to the drainage plane detail coming from Dr. Lstiburek, buildingscience.com. I have not yet found the detail on buildingscience.com.
To me it only makes sense as a path for condensation drainage. But that path would need to be open to air at the bottom to allow drainage, or would there be a permeable barrier at the base to enable condensation escape.
Any other perspective on this?
I believe it is coming from Joe L's beer screen idea:
https://buildingscience.com/documents/building-science-insights-newsletters/bsi-026-they-all-laughed
There it is about diffusion for assemblies with insufficient exterior rigid for condensation control (ie 2x6+R5). You have enough exterior rigid that this is not an issue.
I remember reading a study that looked at water management for commercial exterior rigid walls with WRB under the rigid. Even under extreme wind driven rain, no water made it to the WRB layer.
Thanks for the link Akos. Great article. I have a fair bit of Polyiso to install so I have already started to kick up my beer game :)
Footnote 6 addresses my concern about the additional gap:
"I am not allowed to tell you how I know this for reasons I can’t get into…but trust me on this….you need to keep the gap less than 1/8 inch to limit the loss in thermal performance of the exterior continuous insulation below 5 percent….which is less than the loss in thermal performance that occurs due to the thermal bridging associated with attaching the cladding and continuous insulation itself…."
Lstiburek has sometimes conflicted with himself over time. I chalk that up to learning more as time goes on, since it's often the case with buildings that it takes years to see if an idea really works or not. I do not fault him for that, and I think he is honest about things when he finds out something he thought was a good idea wasn't so great after it had been tested over the years.
Risinger I think overdoes things sometimes. This is sort of like belt, suspenders, overalls, double underwear, parka, coat, and poncho. Sure, it does give you extra layers of protection, but did you really gain enough to justify all the extra cost? I like that he tries to think through details that many miss, but it's also possible to go overboard with details that don't really gain you much for the costs they impose. Many redundant WRBs is an example of this. If you have one properly installed WRB and flash things properly, you're in pretty good shape.
Bill
Agreed Bill: "....I think overdoes things sometimes. This is sort of like belt, suspenders, overalls, double underwear, parka, coat, and poncho". :)