GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted

Community and Q&A

Cellulose vs fiberglass

tdbaugha | Posted in General Questions on

Hello,

I have read about windwashing causing loose fill fiberglass insulation to be derated in true R value whereas cellulose is not. Does anyone have a link to test data showing this? Or other information to share?

Does the same apply for a BIBS fiberglass vs wet sprayed or dense packed cellulose in the walls?

I’m just looking for a justification for spending more money for the same basic install cellulose vs fiberglass.

Thanks

GBA Prime

Join the leading community of building science experts

Become a GBA Prime member and get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

Replies

  1. matthew25 | | #1

    If you have windwashing in your wall cavities you have a much bigger problem on your hands. Everything should be air sealed.

    There is no good justification for spending more on cellulose in the walls. Fiberglass has a slightly higher R-value, it is a little less environmentally friendly but still way better than any foam or mineral wool options. The blown-in blanket methods give you a nice install if the installer does a good job.

  2. Malcolm_Taylor | | #2

    tdbaugha,

    If you want to dive into actual numbers, see table 8 and the accompanying text in this link:
    https://www.rdh.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Van-Straaten-Windwashing.pdf

  3. tdbaugha | | #3

    Mostly curious about attic windwashing. Although the link Malcom provided is kinda neat for comparing exterior insulation. Looks like rockwool and eps are both pretty solid.

    I did further reading today and it seems like 20-30 yr old fiberglass was more prone to the reduced R value as compared to modern blends.

    1. Malcolm_Taylor | | #4

      tdbaugha,

      I haven't seen comparative numbers for attics, just general advice cautioning against the fiberglass, like this from Hammer and Hand's Best Practices Manual:
      "Do not use blown-fiberglass due to light density / wind washing".

    2. matthew25 | | #5

      My advice to stick with cheaper fiberglass was specifically in reference to exterior walls. But, interestingly, even if you put fiberglass in the attic and it lost the full 0.7 R-value that RDS article stated, it would still be very close to the R-value of cellulose at R-3.5.

      Edit: Actually I read the table incorrectly. The loss of R-0.7 is across the entire R-13 batt, it’s not an R-value per inch loss. So in that case the fiberglass batt matches the cellulose. It’s basically R-7.3 fiberglass vs R-7.25 cellulose for the same 3.5” stud bay. I would still vote for BIBS fiberglass, your effective R-value should be higher than a batt. Owen’s Corning BIBS system is marketed as R-4.2 per inch.

      Are you including any HVAC equipment in your attic space?

      1. Malcolm_Taylor | | #6

        matthew25,

        What's not clear is how much wind-washing attic insulation experiences. The RDH research assumed fairly minor air-movement in the walls. Articles like the recent blog by Allison Bailes seem to show it can be quite high in attics. https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/article/the-impact-of-wind-washing-on-insulation-r-value

      2. tdbaugha | | #7

        No HVAC in the attic.

Log in or create an account to post an answer.

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |