GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted

Community and Q&A

ASHRAE 62.2 2010

GBA Editor | Posted in General Questions on

I saw recently that ASHRAE had published an updated ventilation standard for residential ventilation (62.2 2010) that is supposed to make fulfilling the standard easier for existing home retrofits, only I can’t find out what the changes are. Rather than buying the standard myself, I’m wondering if anyone can give me a quick summary.
Thanks.

GBA Prime

Join the leading community of building science experts

Become a GBA Prime member and get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

Replies

  1. GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #1

    Amanda,
    Here is the ASHRAE press release:

    ASHRAE Publishes 2010 Residential IAQ Standard

    ATLANTA – Changes to make requirements easier to use in home retrofits are covered in the newly published 2010 residential ventilation standard from ASHRAE.

    ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.2-2010, Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Low-Rise Residential Buildings, is the only nationally recognized indoor air quality standard developed solely for residences. It defines the roles of and minimum requirements for mechanical and natural ventilation systems and the building envelope intended to provide acceptable indoor air quality in low-rise residential buildings.

    The 2010 standard encourages home retrofits to improve indoor air quality through allowance of alternative methods for meeting the standard’s requirements regarding kitchen and bathroom exhaust fans. The standard currently requires fans in those rooms.

    “This change makes the standard much easier to use in home retrofits, which is very important considering massive federal and state government efforts in this area,” Steven Emmerich, committee chair, said. “For example, installation of new equipment in some existing homes can be a barrier in terms of expense and practicality. Under the alternative compliance path, the overall whole-house ventilation rate can be increased to compensate for insufficient or non-existent bathroom exhaust.”

    The overall approach to residential ventilation in the standard has not changed since the 2007 version was published, such as whole house mechanical for most houses, local exhaust in baths and kitchens and some source control measures.

    Additional improvements to the standard include more accurate factors for intermittent whole-house systems; changes to better limit unintended (potentially contaminated) air transfer from garages, leaky ducts, adjacent housing units, and other such spaces; and deletion of an exception for certain climates that had allowed the use of windows instead of fans given that studies have shown that windows are not used enough and are unreliable for ventilation.

    The cost of Standard 62.2-2010 is $54 ($46, ASHRAE members). To order, contact ASHRAE Customer Service at 1-800-527-4723 (United States and Canada) or 404-636-8400 (worldwide), fax 404-321-5478, or visit http://www.ashrae.org/bookstore.

  2. Amanda Evans | | #2

    Thanks Martin - I got that press release too. I was more wondering exactly what the allowances were. I know that Appendix E last year allowed for 50% credit for infiltration for a leaky house and don't know if that is what they are referring to or if they have further changed it.

  3. Riversong | | #3

    ASHRAE 62.2 is an IAQ standard. It does not address issues of building durability or even seem to recognize the secondary air quality effects of excessive moisture in a confined space, such as a bathroom, that cannot be adequately removed by increased whole-house ventilation.

  4. Paul Francisco | | #4

    The changes mentioned in the news release are those contained in the Addendum e to 62.2-2007, which is now Appendix A in 62.2-2010. If you already have the addendum then you have the pertinent information.

  5. Amanda Evans | | #5

    Thanks Paul, I think the addendum you are referring to is what I was thinking of as Appendix E.

Log in or create an account to post an answer.

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |