GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted

Community and Q&A

Are colloquial R-value recommendations based on nominal or true R-values?

andyfrog | Posted in Energy Efficiency and Durability on

https://www.buildingscience.com/documents/insights/bsi-081-zeroing-in

In this article, Lstiburek says “Here is the list of metrics for the enclosure and equipment for an ultra efficient house in a cold climate like Boston or Chicago or Toronto (as defined by me4):

  • R-5 windows
  • R-10 slab insulation
  • R-20 basement insulation
  • R-40 wall insulation
  • R-60 roof insulation”

Are these nominal or true R-values?

GBA Prime

Join the leading community of building science experts

Become a GBA Prime member and get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

Replies

  1. Expert Member
    Michael Maines | | #1

    Andy, those are generally considered to be nominal R-values, though to achieve them it's usually easy to incorporate thermal breaks so they are also close to whole-assembly R-values.

    1. andyfrog | | #2

      OK, thanks! What about the 'framing factor'? (which I gather is distinct from thermal bridging and merely represents the amount of insulation displaced by framing members, although I'm not sure)

      1. Expert Member
        PETER Engle | | #3

        Both. The framing causes the thermal bridging because its R-value is lower than the insulated wall sections. The amount of thermal bridging is proportional to the percentage of wall framing compared to insulation. So the higher the framing factor, the more thermal bridging causes increased heat flow and the more the whole-wall R-value deviates from the nominal R-value.

Log in or create an account to post an answer.

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |