Air and moisture barriers; a general question
Other than convenience of construction is there any reason not to have the air / moisture barrier immediately behind the drywall?
I realize air sealing around electrical and plumbing penetrations may require additional diligence but if the assembly meets or exceeds full wall and roof R-value for a given climate zone, and is vapor-open to the exterior, is such an assembly system workable?
If okay I would like to try a test build with inbaord sheathing with an inboard side liquid applied barrier.
Do you have any thoughts or experience with this kind of system.
Thanks in advance.
GBA Detail Library
A collection of one thousand construction details organized by climate and house part
Replies
Andrew,
Many wall assemblies have no sheathing at all, and until fairly recently the primary air-barrier was usually either the interior wall finish, or a membrane directly behind it.
Thanks Malcolm. My thought is whether it is still legit and workable from a modern building science perspective. If so, then I think cost effective yet high longevity structures could be produced this way.
Balloon frame with steel (thermastrut); box out window and door opennings and sheath the inside of the framing; air barrier on the inside of the sheathing, then drywall; wiring and plumbing can be installed either early-on from inside or anytime later-on from outside; next install six inches or more of continuous exterior insulation (loose fill is likely sufficient) and then add roofing and rainscreen siding.
That is the concept anyway. But as I am not a builder I am open to the likely possibility I am quite wrong. I thought I would try propose it anyway :-)
That assembly is going to be a pain from a rough in perspective.
I'm not disagreeing because I have never done it but what do you see causing the most difficulty? Secondly, do you think it would be a pain even if the same trades people were to do it again after their first couple of times working it out?
The plywood, and yes.
Okay, good. Thanks.