If you live in Oak Park, Illinois, historic architecture is practically built into your daily routine. Obviously, not every home in the Chicago suburb of 54,000 is representative of the Usonian, Prairie-style vernacular that made Frank Lloyd Wright a household name, but there are approximately 1500 buildings that fit within the boundaries of Oak Park’s Frank Lloyd Wright Historic District—1300 of which are considered “contributing properties” to Oak Park’s Midwestern charm. (Wright and his acolytes are responsible for more than 80 homes within the district.)
As “modern” as these homes might be—as evidenced in their symmetrical façades and “organic” ornamentation, to borrow a term from Louis Sullivan, the so-called father of Modernism who also favored large windows and bays for natural light—their proto-passive designs are not exactly up to 21st-century standards.
Passive design meets old-home heritage
One such home is a three-story single-family house built in 1902. It was designed by little-known British-born architect William G. Barfield, a devotee of the Prairie style, who had his own Chicago practice until his death in 1935. The house recently underwent a complete interior renovation and has been retrofitted to meet the Phius ZERO REVIVE standard (2021).
The effort was led by Tom Bassett-Dilley Architects (TBDA), an Oak Park–based practice specializing in passive design and zero-energy buildings. “The overall mass, window area, and orientation are passive in nature since the home was built before large mechanical systems were a viable option,” reads TBDA’s project summary, posted mid-construction.
The 3569-sq.-ft. house, while not qualifying as Prairie-style in the strictest sense, does meet the streamlined “modern” look of the period. The hip roof has a low(ish) slope, awnings provide passive shading, and its brick and stucco cladding is both modest and economical—all of which is just as well since the home’s historic designation precludes…
Weekly Newsletter
Get building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.
This article is only available to GBA Prime Members
Sign up for a free trial and get instant access to this article as well as GBA’s complete library of premium articles and construction details.
Start Free TrialAlready a member? Log in
2 Comments
The climate performance upgrades sound great. The completely anachronistic back entry, with its modern office-like aesthetics really, really hurts my soul on a historic house like this.
I would very much like to know how the roof was treated, the attic, and venting if any. Was the attic made part of the conditioned space? The home appears to be 2 story vs 1-1/2 but do any parts of upstairs ceilings slope? I also do not see soffit vents. Thanks! p.s. we are restoring a stuccoed Victorian in zone 4c
Log in or become a member to post a comment.
Sign up Log in