The earth’s average temperature has risen by about 1.1°C (2°F) since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. This increase has been caused mainly by human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels, which release carbon dioxide (CO2) and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. The warming that has already occurred has increased the frequency and intensity of heat waves, droughts, floods, and tropical storms. It has also led to rising sea levels and larger, more destructive wildfires. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, even worse disruption can be avoided by keeping total warming below 1.5°C (2.7°F). To do this, we will need to cut carbon emissions in half by 2030.
While carbon has become a buzzword used to quantify climate impacts, the term is shorthand for CO2 and other greenhouse gases (GHGs). The terms low carbon and decarbonization refer to lowering GHG emissions. The construction and operation of buildings accounts for nearly 40% of global GHG emissions. This figure includes operational emissions, which are the GHGs that buildings (both new and existing) emit while in use, and upfront emissions—those released during the extraction, manufacturing, transportation, and assembly of building materials. Building codes like the IECC and certifications like the EPA’s Energy Star and the DOE’s Zero Energy Ready Home have focused on reducing operational emissions and energy consumption. But reducing upfront emissions, which occur before a building is occupied, is also critical to achieving the large, rapid cuts in GHG emissions needed to stay below the 1.5°C threshold.
The need to tackle upfront emissions comes at a time when the building industry is already struggling with labor shortages, material costs, and economic uncertainty. But there is some good news. Free software tools can help architects and builders calculate a project’s upfront emissions. These tools reveal…
Weekly Newsletter
Get building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.
This article is only available to GBA Prime Members
Sign up for a free trial and get instant access to this article as well as GBA’s complete library of premium articles and construction details.
Start Free TrialAlready a member? Log in
2 Comments
I know we'all need to do better on carbon reduction, but really, someone needs to figure out an easy and affordable way to do carbon counting. I tried it in couple of projects and found that it's not for the faint of heart!
Also, should carbon counting be done with the upfront emissions of all materials and products or should we analyze it at 30, 50 or 100 year life cycles. After all, some materials and products may have higher upfront emissions count but can save two or three times the amount of carbon in the long run.
I agree 100% - it's especially true for a solo practitioner architect like me who doesn't have 'people' to do it for me. It's a lot of data mining.
Log in or become a member to post a comment.
Sign up Log in