As I have said during the course of this series on offsite construction, the sector has seen significant advancements, with countries like Sweden leading the global push toward modular building. While Europe and Asia embrace panelized and modular construction, the U.S. lags, accounting for only 5% of its housing market.
Despite these challenges, companies like Clayton Homes and Laing O’Rourke have achieved sustainable growth through gradual scaling and experience-driven strategies. However, barriers such as fragmented building codes and inconsistent market demand continue to hinder broader adoption.
In this final post, I will explore key challenges and potential strategies for overcoming them, aiming to unlock the full potential of offsite construction to address labor shortages, rising costs, and environmental concerns.
Global leaders
In Europe, the adoption of offsite construction has grown significantly. Sweden leads with 85% of its annual residential buildings constructed offsite; the Netherlands follows closely behind at 47%, and Belgium stands at 46%. Other countries, like Poland and Spain (34% each), France (24%), and Japan (20%), also show firm commitments to offsite construction. Even Germany (23%), China (20%), Italy (19%), and the UK (16%) have embraced this method more extensively than the United States, where offsite construction accounts for just 5% of the market.
These insights come from USP Marketing Consultancy, a market research firm specializing in construction trends. While the U.S. lags in percentages, the global embrace of panelized and modular construction points to a future where building processes continue to evolve toward efficiency and innovation, particularly in Europe and Asia. A recent New York Times article, “How an American Dream of Housing Became a Reality in Sweden,” laments that while offsite construction was invented in the United States, it has been more fully developed and exploited abroad.
Even so, Tennessee-based Clayton Homes is the second largest offsite homebuilder in the world, trailing only Japan’s Daiwa House.…
Weekly Newsletter
Get building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.
This article is only available to GBA Prime Members
Sign up for a free trial and get instant access to this article as well as GBA’s complete library of premium articles and construction details.
Start Free TrialAlready a member? Log in
One Comment
Fernando,
Thanks for this fascinating series. I think your insights and conclusions in this final blog make a lot of sense. Our provincial codes up here in Canada are attempting to harmonize and hopefully that will lead to an easier path for both pre-fab buildings and generic plans. It will be interesting to see how that affects the sector in the next few years.
Log in or become a member to post a comment.
Sign up Log in