More Best Practices
You didn’t want to use fiberglass insulation on this project. But you’re trying to avoid spray foam because of its outsized embodied emissions. You got a couple of bids for net-and-blow cellulose, excited by the carbon-storing capabilities of this recycled material. One bid was really high; it seemed like the contractor wasn’t interested in a small job like yours. The other was reasonable. But that contractor couldn’t get there for two weeks, which would mean losing your spot on the drywaller’s schedule. So here you are in aisle 18 of the big-box store, questioning your green credentials and hoping you can get your dolly through the parking lot without running into anyone you know.
An anecdotal truth
Fiberglass batts have a bad reputation among energy-conscious builders, with some justification. Compared to other insulation types, they are particularly susceptible to installation defects. A lack of proper training and slipshod work practices means that most batt insulation performs well below its rated R-value.
Despite their shortcomings, fiberglass batts remain the most popular insulation product in U.S. homes. They’re inexpensive, readily available, and don’t require special installation equipment. Compared to spray foam, foam board, and even mineral wool, they have lower emissions associated with their manufacture.
These considerations mean that sometimes, using fiberglass batts makes sense. Once that decision has been made, how do we get the best possible result? In this article, we’ll walk through best practices for product selection and installation. We’ll focus mainly on wall cavities but will also cover floors, attics, and cathedral ceilings.
Reasons fiberglass batts underperform
Standard-density fiberglass batts have a nominal R-value of about 3.8 per inch of thickness. Higher-density batts can provide about R-4.3 per inch. These numbers bracket the same general range as cellulose, mineral…
Weekly Newsletter
Get building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.
This article is only available to GBA Prime Members
Sign up for a free trial and get instant access to this article as well as GBA’s complete library of premium articles and construction details.
Start Free TrialAlready a member? Log in
5 Comments
Another technique which helps, (but does cost more time and materials) is to run all your horizontal wiring runs on the bottom-plate, and the vertical ones on the side of the studs, with none bisecting the bays.
I just insulated a 900 sf workshop with fiberglass batts. I tried to be diligent, but doubt even a charitable observer would call it a grade 2 installation.
Mr Taylor, if you run all your wires on the bottom plate will that meet electrical code? doesn't the code require wires to be a certain height off the ground? Or isn't there a higher wetting risk associate with floor run wires?
corbonbldr,
Our electrical code has no interdiction against running wires on the bottom plates, and wires also regularly penetrate them moving from floor to floor.
Presumably the wetting risk you are referring to is from flooding? It's worth remembering that the code allows recessed floor mounted outlets, and resistance heaters.
Great Article, very interesting point on the relationship between batt compression and R-value. Is there a formula or way to calculate batt compression in relation to R-per-inch value? In other words, what's the optimal compression ratio that optimizes fiberglass per-in-R-value?
This is a chart that Owens Corning once had available. I don't know where the highest R per inch falls.
Log in or become a member to post a comment.
Sign up Log in