GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted
Green Communities

Energy Star Version 3

Enterprise hosts new webinar on planning and implementing Energy Star Version 3

Key changes from Energy Star Version 2 to 3
Image Credit: Advanced Energy

Planning is an essential component to the new Energy Star Version 3. Not only is Energy Star Version 3 a component of the Enterprise Green Communities Criteria, but it is also rapidly becoming the go-to energy performance standard for most federal and local funding sources. In response to concern from developers on how to incorporate the new version into their work, Enterprise recently hosted a webinar focusing on this topic: Planning and Implementing Energy Star Version 3.

Krista Egger with Advanced Energy focused on helping developers make decisions now that will set them up for success with Energy Star Version 3. She broke down the components of Energy Star Version 3 into manageable chunks and highlighted technical implementation tips and techniques.

For those of you who applied and received NSP3, this would be a very helpful webinar for you to view. Krista goes over the implementation schedule in detail and explains when the Energy Star Version 3 requirement kicks in!

2 Comments

  1. dickrussell | | #1

    Air inlet height above grade - implementation
    A summary of changes to ES for version 3 was presented here on GBA last March, along with some discussion of what they got right and wrong with the changes:

    https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/energy-star-homes-program-raises-bar-version-3

    One thing I noted was that ventilation air inlets had to be four feet above grade, and I wondered both why that was imposed and how the duct to it would be routed in some houses. I still do. Clearly snow depth is at least one factor, as EPA has amended the first release of ESv3 to specify two feet above grade for CZ 1-3 and still four feet for CZ 4-8. There is a special exception specifying 2 and 2.5 foot numbers for CZ 4 and 5 of North Carolina, based on historic snowfall data, and a note says exceptions may be given for other states based also on historic data.

    Intake of contaminants also seems to be of concern, as the air inlet must be covered with a mesh of 0.5" or tighter mesh to keep out rodents and debris. There also is a recommendation (but not a requirement) that there be easy access to the inlet for periodic cleaning.

    It's a puzzle to me as to why EPA has gone past what ought to be required of the building itself for energy efficiency and into the realm of things that are a matter of periodic maintenance and timely snow removal. Even the four foot height requirement above grade is no guarantee that snow won't bury an inlet in some locations, so why try to make it prescriptive at all, but leave it as a recommendation?

    I haven't seen anything in ESv3 that addresses how to route air inlet ducts to comply with the height above grade requirement. For a house with a basement or at least a crawl space with enough headroom for locating HVAC there, and with minimal foundation wall extending above grade, the location of the inlet hood will have to go through the wall above the basement or crawl space. If there is no closet against an outer wall at a suitable location, for hiding an insulated duct coming up from below, where is the duct supposed to go without looking ugly? It would seem that only a double framed wall or one done with I-joist studs offers any possibility for hiding the duct. I can't help but think that EPA didn't think through that height requirement as to implementation.

  2. wjrobinson | | #2

    Seriously, Dick, building a
    Seriously, Dick, building a thousand square foot home made of hundred thousand components, dozens of systems, rooms full of furniture and people, no place to hide one thousandth of the entire footage a duct?

    You don't need Walt Disney's imagination but I think a closet for example could "cloak" the evil mandated perturbance....

    Just sayin..... (In fun by the way!)
    Aj funster/cryptician/builder/GBAnamerebel

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Related

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |